PORTAL SOLO BLOGGER

Informasi Terbaru,Semua untuk Berbagi....

Showing posts with label Money. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Money. Show all posts
Unemployed deliberately held in call centre queues to promote website

Unemployed deliberately held in call centre queues to promote website


Memo reveals plan to keep jobless on hold so they can hear messages advising them to make claims online

Job seekers are being held in call queues to promote online claims.
Job seekers are being held in call queues to promote online claims. Photograph: Rui Vieira/PA
Jobseekers are being kept hanging on the telephone for at least five minutes before they are connected to a member of staff in jobcentres – a deliberate move to encourage people to make online claims, internal documents obtained by the Guardian reveal.
The new policy, outlined in an memo entitled Job Seekers' Allowance Online Performance Improvement, means that an unemployed person calling a jobcentre call centre will be forced to wait for five minutes not because staff are too busy to answer the phones but so that they can listen to "the advantages of using the online service, ie will receive their entitlement decisions more quickly than those who use the telephone".
Even once claimants get through, the instruction to call centres is to talk them into claiming online. "Those who choose to remain on the phone will be able to use the telephony service to begin their claim".
Charities said that vulnerable people often do not have internet access. A spokesman for the Child Poverty Action Group said: "Claimants themselves are the best judge of whether they are able to make a claim online. The department should not be using this kind of tactic to push them in a direction which might not be suitable for everyone."
Underlining the new policy is the government's target that 80% of new claims for unemployment benefit should be made online by September 2013. By March this year only 20% of new claims were submitted online.
The problem for the welfare secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, is that the online flagship universal credit policy will only work if claimants not only claim jobseeker's allowance and other benefits online but also manage their benefits and job searches online.
"We need to achieve this [80% target] to support the delivery of universal credit next year," reads the memo.
The Department for Work and Pensions emphasised that the government tried to ensure that poor people could access jobcentre call centres. It pointed out that "calls to the telephone claim service are free for all calls from landlines and for the vast majority of mobile users".
Official figures show that about 1.8 million people have already claimed jobseeker's allowance online.
In a statement, Duncan Smith said: "We are now encouraging people who wish to make a claim to jobseeker's allowance to do so online. The Office of National Statistics shows us that 83% of the British population use the internet. Claims that are made online can be processed more quickly and efficiently. Claimants are still free to contact us by telephone to make a claim."
Scottish Widows' managed funds dominate in list of worst performers

Scottish Widows' managed funds dominate in list of worst performers


Survey of 'poorly' funds reveals Scottish Widows' funds have drastically underperformed for investors over last three years

Miniature businessmen standing on stacks of coins on financial newspaper with investments
A survey by Chelsea Financial Services into poor-performing funds has been topped by Scottish Widows. Photograph: Alamy
Investors have £10bn in Scottish Widows funds that have drastically underperformed in each of the last three years, according to a leading investment adviser.
Darius McDermott, managing director of independent financial adviser Chelsea Financial Services (CFS), said that Scottish Widows' managed funds dominated his firm's survey of poorly performing funds, representing the highest number managed by one company – seven – on its list.
The CFS Red Zone survey identifies the worst-performing funds over the last three discrete years, while the Drop Zone highlights the worst of the worst: those that have underperformed their sector averages over the cumulative three-year period to 1 August 2012.
Among Scottish Widows' seven funds are three Halifax-brandedinvestments: the UK FTSE 100 Index Tracking, UK FTSE All Share Index Tracker and UK Growth funds.
Not all of the funds have lost investors money but they could have had better returns had they chosen different fund managers. Standard Life and JP Morgan came joint second with six funds on the list of worst performers.
McDermott said: "These companies run a large number of funds so you would possibly expect them to have a few more underperforming funds lurking around. It doesn't mean this performance shouldn't be addressed though, and perhaps begs the question whether these companies should concentrate on areas where they excel, rather than trying to be all things to all men."
McDermott said that Scottish Widows was trying to tackle some of its performance problems by adopting an "enhanced index strategy" for some of its actively managed funds. "Hopefully this will pay off, but the funds on our list are so far not included in these plans," he said. "£10bn represents a huge number of investors who should expect a lot better from those to whom they entrust their savings."
The worst performing fund was Manek Growth, which underperformed its sector average by 68% during the past three years. The fund is managed by Jayesh Manek, who after winning the Sunday Times Fantasy Fund Manager competition in 1994 and 1995 started a unit trust with £10m seed money.
By 2000, the fund was worth nearly £300m, but collapsed when the dotcom bubble burst and has performed poorly ever since.
CFS said that Manek Growth has managed to lose its investors more than 34% in the last three years, compared with an average positive return of 33%. It is followed by UBS Smaller Companies and Allianz Global Eco Trends, which have underperformed their respective sector averages by 49% and 41% respectively.
However, the most notable inclusion in the list of poor performers is the £2.3bn Fidelity Special Situations fund, managed for the last four years by Sanjeev Shah after its previous manager Anthony Bolton moved to Hong Kong to concentrate on the Chinese market.
Shah initially struggled to maintain the fund's stellar track record and it dropped into bottom quarter of the UK All Companies sector, but performance has improved in the last 12 months and it has moved into the first quartile, growing by 20.7% compared with an average of 14% for the UK All Companies fund sector.
McDermott said: "Our analysis, frankly, makes for pretty depressing reading and I can only urge anyone invested in these funds to consider whether they want to remain invested or switch as quickly as possible to a better fund.
"The only exception I would make is Fidelity Special Situations. I've been a long-term fan of this fund and I'm pleased to see that shorter-term performance year to date has been good and hopefully signals the beginning of a turnaround."
A spokesperson for Scottish Widows Investment Partnership said: "These funds are managed against a bespoke benchmark, not against the wider IMA peer group. Measurement of the success of these funds should therefore take into consideration the funds' actual objectives rather than a 'simple' peer comparison, as the sector is a broad sector with many types of funds with different objectives."

The most-asked money questions on Google

The most-asked money questions on Google

What are the most searched for finance questions on Google? And, importantly, what are the answers to your money queries?

composite of students, money, saffron flower and washing
The questions we Google: should I pay my student loans; can I spend Scottish money in England; why is saffron so expensive; and will my credit cards work after going through the wash?
Start typing a query into Google – or whatever search engine you are using – and its autocomplete function will start suggesting popular questions from other users. So what do you want most answered? One of the top queries in the UK over the Olympics was "is Ian Thorpe gay".
The Australian swimmer was the star of the BBC Olympics commentary team in August. But he also prompted a "huge spike" in internet searches about his sexuality, says Google. Just type "is" into google.co.uk and it automatically tries to complete the sentence as "is Ian Thorpe gay".
The drop-down list in autocomplete is generated by the search engine's complex algorithms, based on other users' search activities and the contents of web pages indexed by Google.
The suggestions often seem strange or just plain silly. Google agrees. It explains: "There may be a search term that seems surprising to you, but after doing some searching on the web, you may discover that it's a popular phrase online for some reason that you didn't anticipate.
"Queries in autocomplete are algorithmically determined based on a number of factors (including search term popularity) without manual intervention."
The suggestions reflect regional activity, so Thorpe tops a search beginning "is" in the UK, but not in the US (where "is shingles contagious" is the top search result).
They also reflect recent activity – so Thorpe is likely to drop out of the list soon. "Is Kate Middleton pregnant" moved up from ninth to seventh most popular this week alone.
Pornography, violence, and hate speech are excluded from autocomplete, but Google has frequently found itself in court over the suggestions autocomplete makes. It lost a case in France last year involving the word "scam" appearing after a particular company's name. Meanwhile, in Japan it is battling a district court's order to suspend autocomplete altogether.
Here we reveal what you most want answered.

Will my credit card work after going through the washing machine?

Credit Crunch Threatens Economy Worried about your credit rating? Your spouse's credit record? No, you're not. Start tapping into Google "will my credit..." and it reveals that the second most common dilemma is whether a credit card will survive a wash cycle. (The first, driven by users in the US, is "will my credit card work in Europe.") The trouble is, the answers that appear at the top of the search results can be as daft as the questions. For example, Yahoo! Answers tells you that a credit card that goes through a washing machine will carry on working so long as it's not damaged – but won't, if it is. True, but not especially helpful (and that was rated as "best answer" by Yahoo! readers).
So we put it to Barclaycard, which operates more than 10m credit cards in the UK. It said: "Water won't damage the ability of a chip to function." The bigger problem will be if the plastic warps or even melts.
It seems credit card plastic can start to melt at around 57C, but that should make it safe in any British summer. Perhaps, though, you should be wary about flashing your plastic in Aziziya in Libya. It holds the record for the highest temperature measured, at 57.8C (136F). Mind you, that was in 1922.
As regards credit cards in Europe the Americans have a point; while our credit cards have a chip and the magnetic strip, most Americans are still using cards with a magnetic strips only, which might be rejected at some payment terminals over here. Tell them it's about European technological superiority.

Is my money safe in Santander?

Santander earnings report Before you've completed typing "is my money safe …" up pops "in Santander" as the suggested question. Evidently loads of you are worried that Spain's crisis-hit economy and bombed-out banking sector will affect your savings in Santander, Spain's second biggest bank and our fifth biggest. Indeed, nearly all of the "is my money safe" suggestions are about Spain, although you also ask about Barclays.
The good news is that one of the first results that comes up on Google was written by the team here at Guardian Money. The basic answer is that Santander UK is wholly ringfenced from Santander Spain, and the Spanish parent company can't prop itself up by pinching capital from its UK operation.
Even a collapse in the euro is likely to hurt the other major banks in Britain a lot more than Santander's UK operations. Still, we always recommend that savers do not put more than £85,000 in any UK bank (Santander included). That's the maximum bailout from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Will a bank accept a torn cheque?

Lots of you worry about cheques being refused – maybe because there is a misspelling, or because it is torn or ripped. It all depends on how and where it is ripped. The industry group responsible for cheques, the UK Payments Administration, says: "There are no hard and fast rules, but there is a standard format, and cheque clearing is an automated process, so any cheque which can't be easily processed, can run the risk of a branch saying that they won't accept it and you'll need a replacement. On all cheques there's a code line at the bottom which is "read" by the processing machines, so it's best for that area not to be damaged. Small cuts or tears (which we can all make to cheques as we try to get one out of an envelope) may not be an issue, but one that has been ripped into a few pieces and is held together by Sellotape, is likely to be rejected.
"Alternatively, your bank may make a small charge for processing a damaged cheque. Since it won't go through the automated process, it can be processed manually. This depends on the service that your bank offers – increasingly, banks require all cheques to go through a one-size-only pipe!"
The standard format means you can no longer write a cheque on an unusual object, as you might have done in the past. According to a Guardian "notes and queries" story in G2, cheques have been written on a cow, a horse, an egg, toilet paper, giant cards, etc. The cow story was actually true (it was a farmer's protest about EU policy) but the bank insisted on keeping the cow as evidence of the payment.

Is it fraud to accept too much change in a shop?

It's not fraud. But it probably is theft. Fraud is "wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain". Fraud would involve inducing the shopkeeper to part with the money, which is hardly the case with too much change.
But knowingly taking too much is theft, defined as the unauthorised taking, keeping or using of another's property. Legally speaking, this does not extend to accepting that extra coin accidentally, for the act of theft has to be accompanied by a "mens rea" – a "guilty mind" – which includes the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the rightful possession of their property or its use. So if you know you have done it, and you know this is wrong (otherwise you would not ask the question) then it is wrong. Irrespective of the law, staff are often forced to make up shortages in the till at the end of the day from their own pockets. Hand it back.

Can I spend Scottish money in England?

Scottish money Yes, you can – but it doesn't legally have to be accepted. Three banks in Scotland are authorised to issue notes: Bank of Scotland, Clydesdale Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland. There are also four note-issuing banks in Northern Ireland: Bank of Ireland; AIB Group (which trades as First Trust Bank in Northern Ireland), Northern Bank and Ulster Bank. Banknotes issued by all seven are legal currency and can be accepted throughout the UK. But it doesn't necessarily mean they will be. The Association of Commercial Banknote Issuers (ACBI) states: "The term 'legal tender' has very little practical meaning as far as ordinary, everyday transactions are concerned, and it has no bearing on the acceptability of authorised banknotes as a means of payment …" Crucially, it adds: "The acceptability of any means of payment, including banknotes, is essentially a matter for agreement between the parties involved."
English shopkeepers who are unfamiliar with them may refuse to accept Scottish or Northern Irish notes. This is usually because they cannot tell whether the note is genuine, rather than their feeling towards the Scots.
Trivia fans may like the following: By law, authorised banks are required to hold backing assets for their notes at all times, which can be done in the form of special Bank of England notes – amounts can range up to £1m notes (Giants) and £100m (Titans).

Why is saffron so expensive?

Brits are deeply puzzled as to why the luminous yellow-orange spice is so pricey. Type "Why is so expensive" into google.co.uk and top is: "why is saffron so expensive?" After that, it's insurance, Photoshop, champagne and Warhammer that users fret about.
Adobe Photoshop is the photo-editing software, and the latest version, CS6, retails for around £449, which is rather a lot if all you want to do is remove red-eye. Warhammer is a part-hobby, part-gaming fantasy battle where players constantly grouch about the cost of individual dark elves, blood knights and dire wolves.
But it's saffron, made from the stigmas of crocuses, which sparks most concern. A Schwartz jar containing just 0.4g retails for £4.16 in Sainsbury's. A kilo will set you back £10,400.
The reason? It takes around two football pitches of crocuses to glean a kilo, with each stigma collected by hand.

Does my student loan affect my credit rating?

Student-loan related questions pepper Google autocomplete: when it will come through, what the interest rate will be, how and when it is paid off, and whether it will affect a mortgage. The credit rating one appears to be one of the most common – and it all depends on when you took out the loan.
The bad news is that if you started higher education between 1990 and 1997, your student loan will impact on your credit score if you are a late payer or miss a repayment. The Student Loans Company writes to late payers giving them 28 days to make contact or the late/missed payment will show up on their credit record. But the good news is that if you started higher education between 1998 and 2011, your "post-98"-type of loan does not show up on credit reference agencies.

Should I pay off my student loan?

University students in exam room The answer depends on whether you have other debts, and when you studied. If you started higher education after 1998, you have a "post-98" loan and are paying interest at 1.5% (the Bank of England 0.5%, plus 1%). You only repay this type of loan if you are earning above £15,795, or from April 2013, over £16,365. You can overpay whenever you like. For details, see studentloanrepayment.co.uk.
If you started higher education between 1990 and 1997, you have the old style "mortgage" type student loan and are paying interest at 3.6%. You must make repayments if you earn over £27,813 a year, though you can pay before that. You can make extra payments on top any time and there are no penalties for early repayment.
If you have other debts, the general rule is to pay them off first before paying off your student loan because the majority of other debts will be costing far more. And remember that, unlike other debts, if you don't earn enough, you simply don't need to repay student loans and any outstanding debt is written off after 25-30 years or if you die.
If you still have cash to spare after paying off other debts, and you have a "post-98" loan, you will be better off saving your excess cash than using it to repay your loan. The interest you can earn in a top savings account outstrips the 1.5% cost of student loans, especially if you are a basic rate taxpayer.
The same cannot be said if you are paying 3.6% on a pre-1998 loan. You will not easily outdo the student loan interest rate. Consider using spare cash to pay off your loan. But, think twice if there is any chance at all that you may need to borrow money in the future.
A step-by-step guide to whether it's worth paying off your student loan, including a useful calculator showing you how long it will take to repay it, is at Moneysavingexpert.com.

Is PayPal safe?

PayPal logo Providing you ignore those "phishing" emails which pretend to come from PayPal (they try to get your personal banking details), it has a good security record. The difficulty is where something goes wrong, possibly with the goods you buy. PayPal is not a credit card so you have no protection under the Consumer Credit Act. It is not regulated, so you can't complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. And its 45-day complaint period – after which it generally refuses to deal with consumers – has no basis in law other than PayPal's own terms and conditions. This can be very short – especially if dealing with an overseas seller.

How long will it take to transfer money overseas?

This really bothers bank customers – both the time it takes and the cost. In the past it could take as long as two weeks, and came with hefty fees.
But, according to the UK Payments Council, rules in place since the start of this year mean that, in Europe at least, it should now be a lot faster. It states: "The day after you send money electronically from a bank within the EU, the money must be received and credited to the recipient account (again, if within the EU). So, for example, if the money leaves my account on a Monday, it must be received and credited by the end of Tuesday."
There are no rules covering payments outside of the UK but your bank should be able to tell you what options there are. The more information you have about where the money is going, the quicker and safer the payment will be. Most banks will offer an option where the money will get to its destination within three to five days. Be aware, though, that not all banks or financial institutions offer the full set of options.

 

Let's move to Moss Side, Manchester

Let's move to Moss Side, Manchester

Let's move to Moss Side, Manchester

What a difference 20 years makes

Moss Side
Moss Side, Manchester: It's changed. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian
What's going for it? There was a time, not so long ago, when the very mention of the words "Moss" and "Side" in one sentence could chill the blood. This was Manchester's Southside, a place where lurked monsters, where the police and ambulance sirens were the nearest you got to birdsong. I'm not going to say everything's ended up happy ever after, but it's definitely changed for the better. Memories linger, of course, of the 1981 riots, of all the gang-related deaths, and you always get some dolt – Chris Grayling, I'm looking at you – demonising the place. But so much energy has been poured into the area, it's a shadow of what it was 20 years ago. It's had only a fragment of the investment pumped into the new Emerald City of glass, but enough to turn it around, to build better relations with the police, as well as places like the Powerhouse library and family homes, to allow locals to tend the flowers in Cranswick Square and to tempt wannabes who can't afford Didsbury. Indeed, 2011's census has Moss Side's population up 30% in a decade, mostly young families. Plus, crime's lower than in Didsbury.
The case against Still has more than its fair share of community tensions. This is Student City, which might not make for the finest neighbours when you're winding the baby at 5am and they're rolling in from Curry Mile. Hope a future of austerity doesn't undo all the good work.
Well connected? You won't want for buses plying Princess and Wilmslow roads – almost one a minute, taking you to central Manchester in 10 minutes. Good cycle network, too.
Hang out at… Curry Mile, or, for the select among you, a quiche at the café at the Whitworth Art Gallery.
Schools Good. Primaries: Webster, St Kentingern's RC and St James CofE all "good", says Ofsted, with Holy Name RC, Heald Place and Wilbraham "outstanding". Manchester Academy, William Hulme's Grammar and Trinity CofE High "good". Xaverian College and Loreto College "outstanding".
Where to buy Moss Side is roughly the wedge of inner city bordered by Wilmslow Road, Princess Road and Wilbraham Road; it's mostly Victorian terraces, having escaped a lot of the postwar rebuilding of Hulme, with plenty of 1960s-1980s terraced infill and a smattering of hefty Victorian semis. Lots of recent new-build, too, often quite nice, such as The Maine Place, on the old Manchester City football ground.
Market values Semis, £140,000-£200,000. Terraces, £75,000-£180,000. Flats, £60,000-£120,000.
Bargain of the week To be honest, you'll be hard pressed not to find a bargain here.

From the streets

Laura Webber-Gant A lively, diverse place that's great for cycling and a short walk from both the university and hospital. But would I choose to live there again? Maybe not.
Sarah Irving One of the interesting developments in recent years is the appearance of a few Somali cafes. A lot are definitely men-only coffee affairs, but Merhaba, opposite Claremont Road Primary School, serves fantastic food for £4-5 all in. And for fresh, local organic veg, Moss Side Community Allotment is the place to be – an active group of residents who have cleared up several derelict allotments and now have chickens, vegetables, a mini-orchard, fruit bushes and plans for beehives.
• Live in Moss Side? Join the debate below.
Moss Side, Manchester: It's changed. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian
What's going for it? There was a time, not so long ago, when the very mention of the words "Moss" and "Side" in one sentence could chill the blood. This was Manchester's Southside, a place where lurked monsters, where the police and ambulance sirens were the nearest you got to birdsong. I'm not going to say everything's ended up happy ever after, but it's definitely changed for the better. Memories linger, of course, of the 1981 riots, of all the gang-related deaths, and you always get some dolt – Chris Grayling, I'm looking at you – demonising the place. But so much energy has been poured into the area, it's a shadow of what it was 20 years ago. It's had only a fragment of the investment pumped into the new Emerald City of glass, but enough to turn it around, to build better relations with the police, as well as places like the Powerhouse library and family homes, to allow locals to tend the flowers in Cranswick Square and to tempt wannabes who can't afford Didsbury. Indeed, 2011's census has Moss Side's population up 30% in a decade, mostly young families. Plus, crime's lower than in Didsbury.
The case against Still has more than its fair share of community tensions. This is Student City, which might not make for the finest neighbours when you're winding the baby at 5am and they're rolling in from Curry Mile. Hope a future of austerity doesn't undo all the good work.
Well connected? You won't want for buses plying Princess and Wilmslow roads – almost one a minute, taking you to central Manchester in 10 minutes. Good cycle network, too.
Hang out at… Curry Mile, or, for the select among you, a quiche at the café at the Whitworth Art Gallery.
Schools Good. Primaries: Webster, St Kentingern's RC and St James CofE all "good", says Ofsted, with Holy Name RC, Heald Place and Wilbraham "outstanding". Manchester Academy, William Hulme's Grammar and Trinity CofE High "good". Xaverian College and Loreto College "outstanding".
Where to buy Moss Side is roughly the wedge of inner city bordered by Wilmslow Road, Princess Road and Wilbraham Road; it's mostly Victorian terraces, having escaped a lot of the postwar rebuilding of Hulme, with plenty of 1960s-1980s terraced infill and a smattering of hefty Victorian semis. Lots of recent new-build, too, often quite nice, such as The Maine Place, on the old Manchester City football ground.
Market values Semis, £140,000-£200,000. Terraces, £75,000-£180,000. Flats, £60,000-£120,000.
Bargain of the week To be honest, you'll be hard pressed not to find a bargain here.

From the streets

Laura Webber-Gant A lively, diverse place that's great for cycling and a short walk from both the university and hospital. But would I choose to live there again? Maybe not.
Sarah Irving One of the interesting developments in recent years is the appearance of a few Somali cafes. A lot are definitely men-only coffee affairs, but Merhaba, opposite Claremont Road Primary School, serves fantastic food for £4-5 all in. And for fresh, local organic veg, Moss Side Community Allotment is the place to be – an active group of residents who have cleared up several derelict allotments and now have chickens, vegetables, a mini-orchard, fruit bushes and plans for beehives.
• Live in Moss Side? Join the debate below.
Do you live in Totnes, Devon? Do you have a favourite haunt or pet hate?
Save the Children launches campaign to help UK families in poverty

Save the Children launches campaign to help UK families in poverty


Save the Children is seeking to raise £500,000 to help children from low-paid working families, who it says are going without hot meals and winter clothes

charities children poverty
Save the Children has launched its first domestic appeal to help families plunged into poverty by cuts and recession. Photograph Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
The international aid charity Save the Children – best known for its work with starving youngsters in Africa – has launched its first domestic fundraising appeal, asking the public to dip into their pockets to help UK families plunged into poverty by cuts and the recession.
The charity is seeking to raise £500,000 to help children across the UK, many from low-paid working families, who it says are going without hot meals, new shoes and winter clothes, and missing out on school trips, toys and treats because their parents cannot afford the rising cost of living.
While the appeal target is modest compared to Save the Children's international humanitarian appeals, the campaign will be seen as a symbolically significant attack on what the charity says is the coalition's failure to tackle mounting poverty, hardship and inequality in the UK.
Launching its appeal, which bears the slogan It Shouldn't Happen Here, the charity said: "It is shocking to think that in the UK in 2012, families are being forced to miss out on essentials like food or take on crippling debts just to meet everyday living costs." Asked whether an anti-poverty fundraising appeal was necessary in the sixth richest country in the world, Chris Wellings, Save the Children's UK head of policy, said: "Poverty in the UK is different to some of the poorer countries in the world. It is more nuanced and poses different problems. But it does not mean that we cannot stand up for children's rights in the UK."
Save the Children plans to spend money raised on its Eat, Sleep, Learn, Play programme, which gives cookers, beds and other essential household items to families living in poverty, and its Fast scheme, which helps low-income parents to provide provide at-home educational support to their children.
Research published by the charity on Wednesday reveals significant numbers of parents in households with income of up to £30,000 a year are willing to skip meals, go into debt, avoid paying bills, and put off replacing worn-out clothing to ensure their children get enough food to eat. Although families below the poverty line (£17,000 a year household income) are worst hit, working families on "modest" household incomes are increasingly struggling to make ends meet as they attempt to cope with shrinking incomes, soaring food and energy costs, and cuts towelfare benefits and public services, says the report. According to a survey of 5,000 UK adults commissioned by Save the Children:
• Nearly two thirds of parents in poverty (61%) say they have cut back on food and over a quarter (26%) say they have skipped meals in the past year.
• One in five parents in poverty says they cannot afford to replace their children's worn-out shoes, while 80% of parents in poverty say they have had to borrow money to pay for food and clothes over the past 12 months.
• Some 44% of families in poverty say that "every week they are short of money", while 29% say they have "nothing left to cut back on".
Parents said financial worries were taking a toll on their physical and mental well-being, triggering arguments and other manifestations of family stress. Low-income parents were twice as likely as better-off parents to split up under the pressure, and more than twice as likely to snap at their children. Justin Forsyth, Save the Children's chief executive, said: "No child should see their parent going hungry or start the new term without a warm coat and with holes in their shoes. Poverty is tearing families apart, with parents buckling under the pressure of mounting bills and children seeing their parents argue more about money."
Save the Children is calling on ministers to stick to 2020 child poverty targets, encourage more employers to adopt the living wage currently set at between £7.20 and £8.30 an hour, provide extra childcare support for low-income parents, and modify the planned universal credit welfare system to allow parents to keep more of their earnings before benefits are withdrawn.The charity's Shouldn't Happen Here report is the second high-profile study by an international aid charity to focus on domestic poverty in recent months. Oxfam's Perfect Storm, published in June, said that cuts and rising living costs were threatening to return the UK tolevels of inequality not seen since Victorian times. An Oxfam spokesman said: "We have never done an appeal in the UK, and we should never have to do an appeal in the UK, but you can never rule it out."

Case study: 'We want to bring him up in a household with working parents'

Once the rent, council tax and utility bills have been paid, Kristie Locke, 20, and her partner, David Rooks, 25, are left with £7.70 a day to buy food, clothes and other essentials for themselves and their eight-month-old baby, Leyton.
They couple live in privately rented accommodation, a two-bedroom flat in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, on a main road, which costs £550 per month.
The fridge contains carrots and green vegetables bought by Save the Children, a box of eggs, and a two-litre bottle of semi-skimmed milk that's almost gone. In a cupboard, tins of tomato soup, dried pasta, tea bags, tinned pineapple and stuffing mix.
They bulk buy disposable nappies and wipes, or take advantage of special offers from Iceland or Asda. Cleaning products come from pound shops. Save the Children bought them a table and chairs, and toys and books for their son.
Rooks has to get up at 1am to cycle to work, driving a lorry for Menzies transporting newspapers, earning £180 a week. He sleeps during the day.
He took out a £1,000 loan to buy a bicycle and furniture. The couple calculated they'd be better off if Locke were a lone parent, or if Rooks gave up work. Neither of them wants to do this – they want to stay together and bring up Leyton in a household with working parents. Locke says she would love to return to work but suggests childcare is too expensive. Rooks couldn't afford to buy a waterproof coat for work as their son – who was born prematurely – needed new clothes. His partner admits they regularly argue about money because of the strain of living on such a low income.
"I don't think it's fair that families on low incomes, such as us, are being taxed so heavily," Locke says. "The government is taking away our money in taxes on the one hand, then giving us little back and not enough to live on. It means I'm virtually trapped in these four walls as I can't afford to go out, as if it's raining I have to get a taxi or bus. David doesn't see why he should have to go out to work for almost nothing, as he's knackered at the end of a week."
The couple regularly miss meals and have to forgo fresh vegetables and fruit as they want to ensure that their baby gets a balanced diet and he eats fresh fruit and veg.
Locke says she would love to go to a soft-play centre with her son and to relax with her fiance for a few hours. Yet it is expensive and would eat into their meagre weekly allowance. The nearest park is one and a half miles away, too far to trek with a baby in a pram. She knows she would be better off if she were a single parent, as the couple once split up, briefly, and she moved into the flat on her own, before they reunited following Leyton's birth. "Previously my bills were £110 a month and I probably had £70 a week for me and Leyton to live on. It's so repetitive all the time living on the same food – mostly it's chicken and oven chips, pasta, spaghetti on toast and soup. We don't eat lunch and we have pancakes for breakfast." When Rooks goes to work, he can't afford to take a packed lunch.
Locke wants to return to college but she is too old to benefit from the free creche. "We don't want to split up because children whose parents stay together do better at school and we want to give him the stability. Neither of us wants to live on benefits."

Disney challenges UK film company over 'misleading' DVDs

Disney challenges UK film company over 'misleading' DVDs


Brighton-based Brightspark company accused of misleading consumers with similar releases to popular Disney films

Artwork for the Brave and Braver films
Artwork for the Brave and Braver films, about which Disney and Brightspark are in discussions.
Film and entertainment giant Disney has threatened an independent British production company with legal action, claiming it is misleading consumers with a series of budget family DVDs which appear to be copycat versions of Disney's own popular animated films.
The Brighton-based firm, Brightspark Production Ltd, recently launched Braver, which Disney said was similar to its blockbuster Brave in more than just its title.
It has complained that the graphics and artwork, including a red-haired princess in a green dress on the cover of the 45-minute "cartoon fairytale", closely resemble that of its own.
Disney has pointed to further DVDs which it also claims infringe its copyright: Tangled up, which compares with its Tangled; The Frog Princess as opposed to Disney's The Princess and the Frog; and Little Cars as opposed to the Disney film Cars.
Disney's film Brave tells the story of Princess Merida who overcomes a curse after refusing to marry a suitor chosen by her parents, while in Braver Princess Angela is kidnapped in a forest after being put under a spell.
Unlike its cut-price rival, the 93-minute Disney/Pixar film has topped the UK film charts grossing £18m at the box office as of last weekend. The DVD will go on sale in the UK in November.
Disney has this week written to Brightspark asking it to withdraw the DVDs or face litigation. The films are widely available in Sainsbury's and Tesco supermarkets (and online) for about £3 each. They are also on sale through Amazon and HMV (Braver will not be available until December), although the former makes it clear to shoppers that they are not Disney merchandise.
Some film fans said the Brightspark DVDs were good value for money, but others expressed their disappointment with the DVDs on film websites.
On Lovefilm, Richv from Barnsley said of Braver: "The contents bore NO relation to the actual film, in fact I would say the packaging is meant to fool you into thinking you were buying the soon to be released 'Brave'. Stylistically I would say this was made about 20 years ago, very cheaply."
Disney said in a statement: "People place great trust in the quality and creativity of Disney, and when it appears that another company is causing confusion among Disney consumers we will act to protect ourselves and the consumer. Disney believes Brightspark has demonstrated a pattern of misleading consumers with numerous releases that confuse and undermine the trust those consumers have in Disney."
Brightspark's Tangled Up has also drawn consumer criticism. In customer reviews on Amazon someone called Flossie said: "This is the worst DVD I have ever purchased, as all the reviews state below. I don't know about Disney taking a law suit but I shall be contacting trading standards myself for such a misrepresentation of any film."
Brightspark said it was in discussions with Disney to find a "mutually acceptable" resolution. In a statement it said: "Braver is an item for families on a budget and I very much doubt that anyone would confuse our production with the wonderful work of Disney.
"All we've tried to do is give parents something their children will hopefully find entertaining. We came up with our title around 18 months ago and if we thought consumers would mistake our film for Brave, we would have renamed it."
It distanced itself from the other DVDs. "We licensed the Little Cars series and Frog Princess from Branscome International in New York. The original production company is based in South America."

Building rules: what the changes mean for homeowners looking to extend

Building rules: what the changes mean for homeowners looking to extend


The government says it will relax the rules around domestic extensions. Here we take a look at what the changes are and how they might affect you

A bricklayer laying a brick
About 200,000 planning applications are received a year for residential improvements. Photograph: Chris Pancewicz/Alamy
Among the raft of changes to the planning rules announced by the government is a temporary relaxation of laws surrounding domestic extensions in England. The full detail will be in a consultation document, expected to be published next week, but here we look at the current rules and how they might change.

What can I currently build?

You can apply for planning permission to build anything you like, although it may very well not be granted, or if you want to make more minor changes without planning permission you can opt for a permitted development. It is the rules around what this constitutes which the government wants to relax.

What currently counts as a permitted development?

It depends where you live: conservation areas and listed buildings have different rules, but broadly speaking extensions, loft conversions and conservatories can all be permitted developments. There are, however, restrictions. When it comes to extensions the main ones are:
• all extensions and other buildings must not exceed 50% of the total area around the house as it stood on 1 July 1948, or the day it was built if later.
• the extension is not on the side of the house that faces the road.
• on a detached house a single storey extension can be up to 4m long and side extensions can only be a single storey.
• on a terraced or semi-detached house a single storey extension can only be 3m long.
• the building must not be clad in any outlandish material – if you want to do something that doesn't match the exterior of your house you will need to get the council's permission.
• single storey extensions must not exceed 4m in height.
• two-storey extensions can only be 3m long.
The government's planning portal has guides and details on common projects including permitted developments.

What about my loft?

You can do a lot to a loft without planning permission – most conversions are permitted developments. However, you will need permission if you want to add a dormer to the front of a house or raise the roof level in any way. You will also be restricted to creating space equal to 40 cubic metres in a terraced house and 50 cubic metres in a semi-detachedproperty.

How will this change under the government's proposals?

It is unclear if there will be any change to the rules surrounding loft conversions. The proposals are expected to include new rules on single storey extensions, which will double the length of a permitted development. This will mean:
• on a detached house a single storey extension can be up to 8m long.
• on a terraced or semi-detached house a single storey extension can be 6m long.
Rules on height, materials and so on are expected to remain unchanged.

Great, anything I need to know before I start building?

Only that the rules are not quite as hard-and-fast as they sound. Chris Wojtulewski, director of planning consultancy Parker Dann, says the rules around permitted developments are "intensely complicated" and councils have a 49-page guide to applying them. "There are subtle variations between local authorities – inevitably people are going to have different interpretations of the rules."
Wojtulewski suggests homeowners who are in any doubt about whether their proposed build is or isn't permitted should contact their local council for clarification at the beginning of the process.
You also need to be aware of building regulations: if an extension doesn't meet them a council can ask for it to be taken down. If you are employing a builder to do your work make sure you confirm they are taking responsibility for meeting the rules.

Can my neighbours complain?

When a homeowner applies for planning permission the council sends out letters to neighbours asking if they have any objections. These are taken into account when a planning officer makes a decision, although the fact a neighbour has complained does not necessarily mean a scheme will be rejected.
This process doesn't occur if you are building a permitted development, but you will still need to notify your next-door neighbours if you are building near to your boundary. Once you start building, any neighbour who believes you are breaking the permitted development rules can contact the council, which will send round an enforcement officer.

When will the new rules apply?

The government is putting the proposals out to a month-long consultation, with a view to changing the rules before the end of the year. They will be in place until the end of 2015.

Is this going to kickstart the economy?

It seems unlikely, and the effects of the changes will be difficult to quantify. Annually there are 400,000 planning applications processed, with almost 200,000 for residential improvements, many of which are for changes such as conservatories or extensions.
Councils do not publish figures for how many of these are rejected, and some householders who are turned down will have gone through with smaller extensions under existing permitted development rules, so it is impossible to say how much extra building work will be done in the nation's back gardens.
Jonathan Harris, director of mortgage broker Anderson Harris, says planning isn't the issue holding many homeowners back. "It's all well and good suggesting the answer to the housing crisis is to extend existing properties, but unless you have got the £20,000 upwards to pay for it sitting in your bank account, there could be funding issues.
"Lending is tougher than before the downturn so getting your mortgage lender to advance the required funds will not be as easy as in the past."

House prices fall slightly as market 'treads water'

House prices fall slightly as market 'treads water'


Halifax figures show a 0.4% monthly decline, in contrast to recent Nationwide data

Young woman looking at houses in estate agent window
Halifax says easing inflation should support house prices in the coming months. Photograph: Alamy
House prices fell for a second month running in August and the housing market continues to "tread water", according to the latest monthly report from mortgage lender Halifax.
The average house price was £160,256 last month, which was 0.4% lower than the previous month, Halifax said, cancelling out two previous rises as prices drifted back to levels seen at the end of 2011.
Halifax's housing economist, Martin Ellis, said easing inflation should boost spending power and support house prices in the coming months, but added that the market was expected to remain flat heading into 2013.
The figures are at odds with a recent report by the Nationwide which showed that house prices rose 1.3% in August, their biggest monthly rebound in more than two-and-a-half years. Nationwide also recorded a 0.7% annual fall compared with Halifax's 0.9%.
However, the two lenders use different methodology, with Halifax calculating its annual price change figure by taking an average over three months and comparing that with the same period of the previous year.
House price data has been volatile in recent months with low sales volumes as banks rein in mortgage lending.
Ellis said: "A gradual upward trend in spending power, aided by lower inflation, should help to support housing demand in the coming months. Nonetheless, house prices are likely to remain flat over the remainder of 2012 and into next year."
Mark Harris, chief executive of mortgage broker SPF Private Clients, said: "September heralds the start of a final push in property sales before the end of the year, as would-be buyers aim to get into their new homes before Christmas, so we expect to see a pick-up in business in the next couple of months."